The Three Thomas Hamalls
Irish & Irish-American Research›The Three Thomas Hamalls
A Cottage Without an Address
Thomas Kenny Hamall (1932–2010) remembered Saturday visits to his father at a cottage in Riverside, a dog in a chair in the yard that had to be left behind, and a trip to Washington in 1947 that he called pivotal. In 1998 he went back to Riverside with his wife, Barbara, to find it. After his death the envelope passed through Barbara to their daughter, who is the researcher.
| Generation | Lived |
|---|---|
| Thomas Henry Hamall | 1880–1938 |
| Thomas Eugene Hamall, his son | 1904–1967 |
| Thomas Kenny Hamall, his grandson | 1932–2010 |
Three men carry the same name. Every record on these pages was tied to the right Thomas by birth year, parents and address, never by the name alone.
Reading the Records Behind the Story
The opinion of the Supreme Court of Illinois in Hamall v. Petru was read in full, and it did not tell the story the family told. Thomas Henry was the complainant, suing to undo a deed he had made himself. Every later record was read the same way: for what it states, who supplied it, and what it cannot say.
Two people photographed separately in the same place have not been shown to be there together. A photograph can prove a place or an object far more often than it can prove company.
Three Men, One Lot
Thomas Henry bought it, lived in it and kept it. His son claimed it as his residence in 1940. His grandson’s memories are borne out where the records reach them and graded where they do not. The cottage itself is gone: the house on the lot today was built in 1989.
The family remembered Emma suing to take the cottage. The opinion tells a more tangled story. In 1914 Thomas deeded the property in trust for his son and kept a life estate. In 1924 Emma won a $2,500 judgment for unpaid support, and the chancellor ordered the trustee to convey the cottage back to Thomas. Thomas then sued to cancel the 1914 deed, and won. The court found a cottage worth less than $1,000 and a homestead the judgment could not reach.
The full methodology sets out the court case as the opinion records it, the address trail from 1932 to 1949, how each photograph was graded, how the records were weighed, where they conflict, and what is still open. Every record is reproduced in the document gallery.
Full Methodology Document Gallery TimelineThe Series
Six posts follow the people behind the records: the lawsuit, the photographs, the man nobody has named, and the shape of a family that came close to ending.
This case study is dedicated to Thomas Kenny Hamall (1932–2010), who kept the one photograph of his grandfather, remembered one pivotal trip, and held on to Riverside. Because he did not let it go, there was something to find.
Does Your Family Have a Story Like This?
Fragments of memory, a few photographs, a place nobody can find any more. Court opinions, draft cards and small-town newspapers often hold what deeds and wills do not. If your family has a story waiting for its records, I would be glad to hear it.
Begin a Research InquiryOr email mary@storylinegenealogy.com