Case Study

Françoise Baiselat Bizelan

The Inheritance of a Fille du Roi:
Three Marriages, Three Estates, Twelve Years of Colonial Justice
How seven legal documents reveal the way colonial New France untangled a Fille du Roi's legacy — when she died in childbirth leaving children from three marriages to three soldiers
~ 1 6 5 1   –   1 6 9 4
3 Estates to Untangle
7 Legal Documents
12 Years of Proceedings
Parish register page from Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles, May 30, 1694, showing the burial of Françoise Baiselat and the baptism of her newborn son François Corbeil on the same page

The Challenge

Pointe-aux-Trembles, May 30, 1694: A woman dies giving birth. Her newborn son is baptized and she is buried on the same day — in the same parish register, on the same page.

Françoise Baiselat (~1651–1694) was a Fille du Roi who arrived in New France in 1668 from the parish of Saint-Sauveur in Paris. Over twenty-six years, she married three soldiers — Laurent Cambin dit Larivière (1668), Pierre Marsan dit Lapierre (1670), and André Corbeil dit Tranchemontagne (1693) — and bore twelve children across two families.

When she died in childbirth on May 30, 1694, she left behind a staggering inheritance problem.

Heirs from Three Marriages
  • First marriage: Marie Cambin (age 25), married to Antoine Galipeau — the only adult heir
  • Second marriage: Seven Marsan children — Françoise (22), Marie Renée (20), Anne Antoinette (17), Jeanne (14), François (11), Jean Baptiste (9), and Joseph (5) — five still minors
  • Third marriage: Newborn François Corbeil — baptized the day his mother was buried
Three Estates to Untangle
  • Laurent Cambin's French land inheritance — a concession of 60 arpents × 20 granted by the Sulpicians in 1670, plus 3,000 livres of property in France
  • Pierre Marsan's Pointe-aux-Trembles habitation — six arpents of cleared land and three head of cattle at the 1681 census, plus a prairie at Ste-Anne
  • Françoise's own acquisitions — land she purchased after Pierre Marsan's death on March 4, 1693

The third husband, André Corbeil — just 27 years old — had no money. He could not sign his name. And he was now responsible for resolving three estates, paying burial costs, and providing for at least one infant son and five Marsan stepchildren.

Notarial transaction document from June 7, 1694, before the Royal Notaries at Ville-Marie, showing the assembly of three families to settle the inheritance of Françoise Baiselat

The Breakthrough

June 7, 1694 — one week after the burial. Three families from three marriages assemble before the Royal Notaries at Ville-Marie to negotiate the future of twelve children and three estates.

The breakthrough came through discovering a complete chain of seven legal documents spanning twelve years (1694–1706). Together, they reveal not just what happened to Françoise's estate, but how colonial New France's entire institutional infrastructure — notaries, curé, churchwarden, tuteur, and ultimately the Intendant of New France himself — mobilized to resolve one woman's legacy.

The Document Chain
1. The Tutelle Petition (June 1694) Antoine Galipeau petitioned the Lieutenant général de l'Isle de Montréal, stating the death occurred "sept ou huit jours" ago and that minor children needed guardianship. Judge Juchereau ordered an assembly at 5 o'clock. Gilles Marin was elected tuteur; André Corbeil became subrogé tuteur for his infant son.
2. The Three-Family Transaction (June 7, 1694) Before the Notaires Royaux, Corbeil (widower), Galipeau and Marie Cambin (first marriage), and Gilles Marin (tutor for Marsan minors) negotiated the division. Marie Cambin's share was settled at 50 livres. Corbeil would pay in three annual installments — "en monnoye ou bled froment bon, loyal et marchand."
3. The Séguenot Compromise (1694) Curé François Séguenot took charge of the burial costs. The prairie at Ste-Anne was ceded to the six minors. Payment divided equally among: Antoinette, Jeanne, François, Jean, Joseph Marsan, and François Gourbeille.
4. The Du Fresne Exclusion (September 27, 1697) Jean-Baptiste Dufresne, who had married Marie Renée Marsan, was excluded from reimbursement because "il n'a jamais voulu consentir à payer sa part" — he never agreed to pay his share of burial costs. Séguenot personally forgave 14 livres owed by the minors.
5. The Ratification (November 24, 1694) All parties appeared before Notaries Maugue and Basset to formally ratify the agreements. Signed by Tranchemontagne, Donay, Séguenot, and gillemarin.
6–7. The Raudot Ordonnance (June 25, 1706) Twelve years later, François Marsan — now 23 and about to marry — challenged the settlement. Intendant Raudot examined the evidence and ruled in Corbeil's favor, discharging him from 150 livres he had already overpaid.
Intendant Raudot's ordonnance from June 25, 1706, discharging André Corbeil from further payment obligations — the final document in a twelve-year legal saga

The Result

The reconstruction of Françoise Baiselat's inheritance reveals colonial justice as a practical, adaptive system — not a rigid legal framework but a negotiated process involving family, church, and state.
How Colonial Justice Actually Worked

The seven documents reveal a system that was remarkably flexible and collaborative. When André Corbeil had no money, the colony accepted wheat as payment. When he needed to settle debts, he exchanged land — trading his Pointe-aux-Trembles habitation to André Archambault for 350 livres, with 300 going directly to the Marsan children. When the church demanded burial costs, it also absorbed losses — Curé Séguenot personally forgave debts and the prairie was held in trust for the minors.

Key Findings
  • The tutelle system effectively protected minor children's interests across decades — even against challenges from adult heirs
  • The church functioned as both spiritual authority and practical mediator, with the curé personally absorbing financial losses
  • Even the poorest colonists could navigate complex multi-party disputes through the notarial system
  • Family members who refused to cooperate (Du Fresne) were excluded from benefits — the system enforced reciprocal obligation
  • The Intendant of New France himself adjudicated a family inheritance case — colonial administration reached to the household level
Documented Life Narrative

The case study complements the full documentary biography of Françoise Baiselat, which traces her life from Paris through three marriages and twenty-six years at Pointe-aux-Trembles. Together, the biography and case study reconstruct her complete story — from the enamel maker's daughter who crossed the Atlantic at seventeen, to the mother of twelve whose death at approximately forty-three triggered a legal saga that engaged every level of colonial authority.

The Evidence Base

Reconstructed from 32 primary sources: notarial acts before the Royal Notaries of Montréal, parish registers from Saint-Enfant-Jésus (Pointe-aux-Trembles) and Notre-Dame-de-Québec, the 1681 census, PRDH database records, BAnQ archival documents, guardianship proceedings, and the Intendant's ordonnance — spanning from Françoise's 1668 arrival in New France to the final court ruling of 1706.