Case Study • Full Methodology

Françoise Baiselat Bizelan

The Inheritance of a Fille du Roi: How Seven Legal Documents
Reveal Twelve Years of Colonial Justice
← Back to Case Study Summary

Methodology & Evidence Analysis

This methodology documents the research process and primary source analysis behind the Françoise Baiselat inheritance case study. Seven legal proceedings — spanning from June 1694 to June 1706 — are examined chronologically, with each document analyzed for what it reveals about colonial justice, family dynamics, and the institutional mechanisms that protected minor children in seventeenth-century New France.

The analysis draws on notarial acts from the greffe of Jean Lecomte at Québec and those of Antoine Adhémar, Bénigne Basset and Claude Maugue at Montréal; parish registers from Saint-Enfant-Jésus (Pointe-aux-Trembles), Notre-Dame-de-Montréal and Notre-Dame-de-Québec; guardianship proceedings from the Bailliage de Montréal; the 1681 census; database records from the Programme de recherche en démographie historique; the Intendant's ordonnance of 1706; and, for her Paris origins, three acts of the Minutier central des notaires de Paris.

Database records are reproduced here as structured transcriptions rather than as screen captures. A database entry is an editorial rendering of a record, not a transcription of it, and the distinction matters: where a database field and an original register differ, the register governs.

When a Fille du Roi dies in childbirth leaving heirs from three marriages to three soldiers, how does a colony with no established precedent untangle three estates, protect six minor children, and resolve disputes that span over a decade?

Phase 1

The Woman: Françoise Baiselat's Life in Context

~1651 Paris — 1694 Pointe-aux-Trembles

To understand the inheritance crisis, we must first understand the woman at its center. Françoise Baiselat was born at Paris, in the parish of Saint-Sauveur, the daughter of Benjamin Baiselat, potier d'étain — a master pewterer — who also served as porte-verge, or bedeau, of that church, and of Claude Prou.

Written Conclusion — Date of Birth

Françoise Baiselat was born at Paris, in the parish of Saint-Sauveur, after 11 June 1649 and probably in 1650 or 1651. Her parents contracted marriage on 11 June 1649 before Jacques Roussel I and Michel Desprez at Paris, and she is named as their daughter — "sa fille d'elle et dudit défunt" — in the service contract her widowed mother made for her on 27 July 1664 before Louis Giron. She cannot therefore have been born in 1646, the year implied by her stated age of thirty-five in the census of 1681. Stated ages in colonial censuses are approximations and are frequently overstated; the marriage contract of her parents is a contemporaneous record of an event that fixes the earliest date she could have been born. PRDH-IGD and Fichier Origine both estimate vers 1651, which is consistent with that limit.

Three Paris acts carry her early life. Her parents' marriage contract of 11 June 1649 shows Benjamin as a widower of Paulette Quinsin, living in the rue Saint-Denis, marrying Claude Prou, daughter of the late Claude Prou and of Élisabeth Olivier, with a dowry of 500 livres, half of it as propre. Benjamin signed the contract; Claude Prou did not. The inventory taken after Benjamin's death, dated 10 February 1662, shows the family living in the rue et paroisse Saint-Sauveur and records that all his children were still minors — including the daughters of his first marriage.

The third act is the most personal. On 27 July 1664, Claude Prou — by then the authorised wife of Pierre Aubry, a mason of Paris, and living in the rue Neuve in the same parish — placed her daughter in service before the notary Louis Giron: "pour le profit faire de Françoise Baiselat, sa fille d'elle et dudit défunt, l'avoir baillée et mise ce jour d'hui en service et allouée durant le temps de trois années, avec Pierre Sellier, maître boutonnier, demeurant rue Montmartre, paroisse Saint-Eustache, absent et acceptant par Marguerite Fournier, sa femme." No payment is recorded. Françoise was about thirteen. The term would have run to the summer of 1667; she sailed the following year.

She arrived at Québec in the summer of 1668, about seventeen years old, as a Fille du Roi. What followed was a quarter century of marriage, childbearing, widowhood, and remarriage that would define her legacy — and create the inheritance crisis that engaged every level of colonial authority.

First Marriage — Laurent Cambin dit Larivière (August 16, 1668): Françoise married Laurent Cambin at Notre-Dame-de-Québec, six weeks after her arrival. He was thirty-two, a sergeant in the company of Sidrac Dugué de Boisbriand, of the Carignan-Salières Regiment, and had been baptized at the parish of Saint-Agricol in Avignon on 1 January 1636. Two days before the wedding, on 14 August 1668, the couple passed a marriage contract at Québec before the royal notary Jean Lecomte — an act examined in Phase 4 below, because its terms were still being litigated twenty-five years later. Their only child, Marie, was baptized on 13 June 1669 at Ville-Marie. Laurent was buried on 5 May 1670 at Notre-Dame-de-Montréal, the record giving his age as thirty-five, naming his company — "sergent de la compagnie de M. du Gué" — and noting that he had been taken from the hospital, "pris à l'Hôpital". By his baptism of January 1636 he was in fact thirty-four. Françoise was left a widow at about nineteen with an infant daughter.

Second Marriage — Pierre Marsan dit Lapierre (September 22, 1670): Four months after Laurent's death, Françoise married Pierre Marsan at Notre-Dame-de-Québec. He came from the parish of Saint-Nicolas in Rouen, and this was his first marriage; both his parents were already dead. The parish register of 1680 calls him "ancien sergent du régiment de Carignan", without naming a company, and the record of Marie Cambin’s marriage in July 1688 — at which both he and Françoise were present — gives his occupation as sergent; the Genealogy of the French in North America places him in the Chambly–La Motte company. Over the next twenty years Françoise and Pierre had ten children — the first two baptized at Notre-Dame-de-Montréal, the remaining eight at Pointe-aux-Trembles — of whom seven survived to adulthood. By the 1681 census the family farm comprised six arpents of cleared land and three head of cattle. Pierre died between 28 April 1691, when his youngest child was baptized, and 4 January 1693, when Françoise remarried as his widow.

Third Marriage — André Corbeil dit Tranchemontagne (January 4, 1693): Françoise married the twenty-six-year-old André Corbeil at Saint-Enfant-Jésus in Pointe-aux-Trembles. The marriage record notes that she was described as widow "in her third marriage" of Pierre Mercan. This marriage would last barely sixteen months.

Methodological Note The PRDH database provides the chronological framework for Françoise's life, but its fields are editorial renderings rather than transcriptions: names are taken from the card, ages only from the register, and where the two disagree the register governs. Her identity across twenty-six years and eight spellings — Baisela, Baisla, Beselat, Baizela, Bizelan, Bizelon, Bizetan, Biselon — rests not on the surname but on the constant parental pair, Benjamin Baiselat and Claude Prou, and on the Saint-Sauveur origin. No marriage contract has yet been located for her second marriage, to Pierre Marsan, and its absence became a point of contention in the later proceedings.
Phase 1 — Database Records, Transcribed
PRDH-IGD, Individual no. 11941 — Marie Françoise BIZELAN
Status: Immigrant. The single record that carries all three marriages in sequence.
FieldEntry as recorded
FatherBenjamin Bizelan
MotherClaude Proulx
BirthVers 1651 — st-sauveur, v. et archev. paris, ile-de-france (paris)
Burial30 May 1694 — Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus)
First marriage16 Aug 1668, Québec (Notre-Dame-de-Québec), with Laurent Cambin Larivière, son of Denis Cambin and Pierrette Caillau
Second marriage22 Sep 1670, Québec (Notre-Dame-de-Québec), with Pierre Marsan Lapierre, son of Jean Marsan and Jacqueline Devincennes
Third marriage4 Jan 1693, Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), with André Corbeil Tranchemontagne
PRDH-IGD, "Individual," no. 11941, Marie Francoise Bizelan; French interface; accessed 19 September 2026. The birth is the database's own estimate, not a record.
PRDH-IGD, Marriage no. 66778 — Laurent CAMBIN & Françoise BAISELA
Québec (Notre-Dame-de-Québec), 16 August 1668. Ten persons named.
RankNameRole, origin and status as recorded
01Laurent CambinGroom. Origin: St-Agricole, ville et évêché d'Avignon
02Françoise BaiselaBride. Origin: St-Sauveur, ville de Paris
03Denis CambinFather of 01 — marked deceased
04Pierrette CaillotMother of 01 — no status marked
05Benjamin BaiselaFather of 02 — marked deceased
06Claude ProuMother of 02 — no status marked
07Jean Levasseur LavignePresent
08Christophe DroletPresent
09Adrien MichelonPresent
10Henri DebernièresPriest, officiating
PRDH-IGD, "Mariage," union no. 66778; accessed 19 September 2026. No ages are given. Only the two fathers are marked deceased. Levasseur, Drolet and Michelon were all present two days earlier at the marriage contract.
PRDH-IGD, Marriage no. 66943 — Pierre MERSAN LAPIERRE & Françoise BAIZELA
Québec (Notre-Dame-de-Québec), 22 September 1670. Nine persons named.
RankNameRole, origin and status as recorded
01Pierre Mersan LapierreGroom, first marriage. Residence Montréal; origin paroisse de St-Nicolas, ville de Rouen
02Françoise BaizelaBride, widow
03Jean MersanFather of 01 — deceased
04Jacqueline DevincentMother of 01 — deceased
05Laurent Cambin LarivièreFormer spouse of 02, residence Montréal — deceased
06Charles Palentin LapointePresent
07Léonard Treny LaverdurePresent
08Étienne Denevert BrantignyPresent
09Henri DebernièresCuré of Notre-Dame-de-Québec, officiating
PRDH-IGD, "Marriage," couple no. 66943; accessed 19 September 2026. No ages are given.
PRDH-IGD, Famille no. 3334 — Pierre MARSAN LAPIERRE & Marie Françoise BIZELAN
Married 22 September 1670 at Québec. Ten children. The governing record for the second family.
#ChildBirth / baptismMarriageDeath / burial
1Françoise5 Oct 1671, Montréal (Notre-Dame)26 Nov 1685, Gilles Marin16 Sep 1745, Pointe-aux-Trembles
2Marie Renée14 May 1674, Montréal (Notre-Dame)23 Nov 1693, Jean Baptiste Dufresne19 Oct 1716, Montréal (Notre-Dame)
3Anne Antoinette18 Oct 1676, Pointe-aux-Trembles19 Apr 1700, Pierre Biroleau Lafleur17 Dec 1735, Rivière-des-Prairies
4Pierre22 Nov 1678, Pointe-aux-Trembles—29 Nov 1678, Pointe-aux-Trembles
5Jeanne2 Jan 1680, Pointe-aux-Trembles29 May 1702, Pierre Cadieux28 Dec 1755, Rivière-des-Prairies
6François13 Mar 1683, Pointe-aux-Trembles14 Feb 1707, Marie Élisabeth Desroches2 Jan 1750, Pointe-aux-Trembles
7Jean Baptiste11 Mar 1685, Pointe-aux-Trembles16 Oct 1709, Marie Anne Denis Fronsac16 Apr 1718, Pointe-aux-Trembles
8Marie Catherine15 Apr 1687, Pointe-aux-Trembles—24 Oct 1687, Pointe-aux-Trembles
9Joseph19 Mar 1689, Pointe-aux-Trembles23 Nov 1711, Marie Jeanne Foran18 Jun 1740, Pointe-aux-Trembles
10Catherine28 Apr 1691, Pointe-aux-Trembles—6 Jun 1691, Pointe-aux-Trembles
PRDH-IGD, "Famille," union no. 3334; accessed 19 September 2026. Marriages shown are first marriages only. Anne Antoinette is one daughter, not two.
PRDH-IGD, Marriage no. 11476 — Antoine GALIPAU & Marie CAMBIN
Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), 19 July 1688. Fourteen persons named — the fullest gathering of this family on record.
RankNameRole, origin and status as recorded
01Antoine GalipauGroom, first marriage, present. Origin: paroisse de Dissé, évêché de Poitiers
02Marie CambinBride, first marriage, present
03Antoine GalipauFather of 01, spouse of 04 — no presence marked
04Perrine RainauMother of 01, spouse of 03 — no presence marked
05Laurent CambinFather of 02, spouse of 06 — deceased. Origin given as St-Sauveur, archevêché de Paris
06Françoise BizelonMother of 02, spouse of 05 — present. Origin: St-Sauveur, archevêché de Paris
07Gilles GalipauBrother of 01, present
08Pierre MersanStepfather of 02, spouse of 06 — present. Occupation: sergent
09Gilles MarinPresent
10Grégoire SimonPresent
11Jean Bricau LamarchePresent
12Françoise MersanPresent — the bride's half-sister
13Renée MersanPresent — the bride's half-sister
14SeguenotCuré, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), officiating
PRDH-IGD, "Marriage," couple no. 11476; accessed 19 September 2026. Two points of caution. The origin recorded at rank 05 for Laurent Cambin — St-Sauveur, Paris — is the bride's mother's origin, not his: he came from Saint-Agricol in Avignon, as his own records show. And the occupation recorded at rank 08 is the database's rendering, not the register's wording. Both illustrate why a database field is not a transcription.
PRDH-IGD, Marriage no. 11494 — André CORBEIL TRANCHEMONTAGNE & Françoise BIZELON
Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), 4 January 1693.
RankNameRole and status as recorded
01André Corbeil TranchemontagneGroom, first marriage
02Françoise BizelonBride, widow
03Pierre MercanFormer spouse of 02 — deceased
PRDH-IGD, "Marriage," couple no. 11494; accessed 19 September 2026. The card carries two editorial notes: that the officiant omitted to sign, and that the wife is described as "widow in her third marriage of Pierre Mercan."
PRDH-IGD, Individual no. 32499 — André CORBEIL TRANCHEMONTAGNE
Status: Immigrant. The third husband.
FieldEntry as recorded
Baptism28 April 1666 — St-Porchaire, diocese of Saintes, Saintonge (ar. Saintes, Charente-Maritime)
Burial13 October 1740 — Montréal, Rivière-des-Prairies (St-Joseph)
First marriage4 Jan 1693, Pointe-aux-Trembles, Marie Françoise Bizelan, daughter of Benjamin Bizelan and Claude Proulx
Second marriage14 Feb 1695, Pointe-aux-Trembles, Marie Charlotte Poudret Lavigne, daughter of André Poudret Lavigne and Marie Jeanne Burel
PRDH-IGD, "Individual," no. 32499; accessed 19 September 2026. The parental pair given here — Benjamin and Claude Proulx — is what links this 1693 record to the 1668 bride twenty-five years earlier. He is not to be confused with Jean Sulière dit Tranchemontagne of L'Assomption, an unrelated family sharing the dit name.
PRDH-IGD, Burial no. 48912 — Laurent CAMBIN LARIVIERE
Montréal (Notre-Dame-de-Montréal), 5 May 1670. The record that names his company.
RankNameDetail as recorded
01Laurent Cambin LarivièreThe deceased. Age: 35. Profession: sergent de la compagnie de M. du Gué. Origin: Avignon
PRDH-IGD, "Burial," no. 48912; accessed 19 September 2026. Two editorial notes on the record: that the officiant omitted to sign, and the phrase "pris à l'Hôpital". The stated age of thirty-five is the register's; computed from his baptism of 1 January 1636 he was thirty-four — an ordinary discrepancy in colonial burial entries, where ages were given from memory.
PRDH-IGD, Individual no. 54664 — Pierre MARSAN LAPIERRE
Status: Immigrant. The second husband. No death and no burial are recorded.
FieldEntry as recorded
FatherJean Marsan
MotherJacqueline Devincennes
BirthVers 1626 — st-nicolas, v. et archev. rouen, normandie (ar. rouen, seine-maritime)
Marriage22 Sep 1670, Québec (Notre-Dame-de-Québec), Marie Françoise Bizelan
Death / burialNot recorded
PRDH-IGD, "Individual," no. 54664; accessed 19 September 2026. The blank death and burial are consistent with the absence of a burial entry in the Pointe-aux-Trembles register. This record renders the mother's name as "Clodomire Proulx," where her own record gives "Claude Proulx" — an illustration of why database fields are not transcriptions.
May 30, 1694 — The day that changed everything
Phase 2

The Death and the Birth

May 30, 1694 — Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles

On the same page of the parish register of Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Curé Séguenot recorded two events that would set everything in motion. First, Françoise Baiselat was buried: "Le 30 may 1694 a esté inhumée dans notre cimetière Françoise Bizelan femme d'André Gourbeil dit Tranchemontagne..." Among the witnesses who signed: gillemarin, Jean Beauchamp, François Raignault.

Immediately below, on the same page, the baptism of her newborn son: "Le 30 may 1694 a esté bastisé François fils de andré gourbeil et de Françoise Bizelon... le parrain le dit François Planchard, la marraine Marie Roy fille qui a declaré ne scavoir signer, mesme le pere de cet enfans..." In the margin of the baptism, a later hand wrote the annotation: "died after giving birth to her son François."

The database records confirm the details, and all three are transcribed below: the burial (no. 11824), the baptism (no. 10431) with François Rainau Planchard as godfather and Marie Roy as godmother, and the Individual record for François Corbeil (no. 32500), which shows only his baptism — no marriage, no burial. He vanishes from the record. Nothing more is known of this child.

Evidence Analysis The parish register page is the single most important source in this case study. The juxtaposition of burial and baptism on the same page, on the same day, with the marginal death note, tells the story more powerfully than any narrative could. Note that André Corbeil could not sign his name — "mesme le pere de cet enfans" could not sign — establishing an illiteracy confirmed in every subsequent notarial act, where he is repeatedly recorded as having "déclaré ne sçavoir escrire ny signer."
Phase 2 — Database Record, Transcribed
PRDH-IGD, Burial no. 11824 — Françoise BIZELAN
Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), 30 May 1694.
RankNameRole and status as recorded
01Françoise BizelanThe deceased
02André Gourbeil TranchemontagneSpouse of 01, now widower
03SeguenotCuré, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus)
PRDH-IGD, "Burial," no. 11824; accessed 19 September 2026. No age at burial is given. The card supplies no given name for the curé; "François Seguenot" is taken from the register of the 1680 baptism of Jeanne Mersan.
PRDH-IGD, Baptism no. 10431 — François GOURBEIL
Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus), 30 May 1694 — the same day, the same page.
RankNameRole as recorded
01François GourbeilThe child
02André GourbeilFather of 01, spouse of 03
03Françoise BizelanMother of 01, spouse of 02
04François Rainau PlanchardGodfather
05Marie RoyGodmother
06SeguenotCuré, officiating
PRDH-IGD, "Baptism," no. 10431; accessed 19 September 2026. The card marks the mother as present. That is a database field, not the register's language, and it is not evidence that Françoise witnessed the baptism: she was buried the same day, and the register records only that the godmother and the child's father could not sign.
PRDH-IGD, Individual no. 32500 — François CORBEIL
Baptism only. No marriage, no burial.
FieldEntry as recorded
FatherAndré Corbeil Tranchemontagne
MotherMarie Françoise Bizelan
Baptism30 May 1694 — Montréal, Pointe-aux-Trembles (St-Enfant-Jésus)
Anything furtherNothing recorded
PRDH-IGD, "Individual," no. 32500; accessed 19 September 2026. He appears in the settlement of June 1694 as an equal heir with his five Marsan half-siblings, and then vanishes from the record.
June 1694 — "Sept ou huit jours" after the death
Phase 3

The Guardianship Petition

June 1694 — Bailliage de Montréal

Before any inheritance could be divided, the law required that guardians be formally appointed for the minor children. Antoine Galipeau — husband of Marie Cambin, Françoise's eldest daughter from her first marriage — initiated the process. His petition to the Lieutenant général de l'Isle de Montréal is a remarkable document, badly damaged by water and age but still legible in its essential details.

The petition identifies Galipeau as a "habitant de la paroisse de la Pointe-aux-Trembles en cette Isle, gendre de deffunte françoise Bistolay" — son-in-law of the late Françoise. He then recites the chain of three marriages: his wife Marie is the daughter of "deffunt Laurent Cambin dit La Rivière" (first husband), Françoise was widow of "deffunt Pierre Mersan dit La Pierre" (second husband), and third wife of "André Gourbeille dit Tranchemontagne, le dit Gourbeille."

Galipeau states the death occurred "sept ou huit jours" ago — seven or eight days — and that Françoise left "plusieurs enfants mineurs" who need guardianship "pour avoir leur biens" — to secure their property. He explicitly requests the appointment of "tuteur et subrogé tuteur" for the minor children.

Judge Juchereau granted the petition, ordering an assembly "pardevant nous en la chambre de l'audience aujourd'huy cinq heures" — at the audience chamber at five o'clock that very day. In the proceedings that followed, the assembled family and community members elected Gilles Marin as tuteur — Marin was married to Françoise Marsan, the eldest Marsan daughter — and designated André Corbeil as subrogé tuteur specifically for his infant son François. The document names the minor children: Antoinette, Jeanne, François, Jean Baptiste, Joseph Marsan, and François Gourbeille.

The signatures on the final page tell the story of who held authority in this community: Juchereau (judge), de Deschambault, Séguenot (curé), gillemarin (the new tuteur), and Adhémar (the notary who would oversee the subsequent transactions).

Evidence Analysis This five-page document, preserved at BAnQ, is the legal foundation for everything that follows. Without the formal tutelle, none of the subsequent transactions would have legal standing. Note that Galipeau — as husband of the first-marriage daughter — takes the initiative, not Corbeil. This establishes a pattern: throughout the proceedings Corbeil acts as the widower managing the estate, while Galipeau acts as the family representative protecting the children's interests. The complementary roles of tuteur and subrogé tuteur reflect the colonial system's built-in checks against conflicts of interest.
Before all of it — 28 September 1693, a mother sues her daughter
Phase 4

The 1693 Accord: A Marriage Contract Enforced After Twenty-Five Years

4 March and 28 September 1693 — Greffe d'Antoine Adhémar, Ville-Marie

The inheritance story begins before Françoise died. Two acts of 1693, both before the royal notary Antoine Adhémar, show her already settling the estate of her first husband — and show the marriage contract of 1668 still doing legal work a quarter of a century later.

4 March 1693 — the concession. François Dollier de Casson, superior of Saint-Sulpice and seigneur of the island, granted Françoise a town lot in the bourg of Pointe-aux-Trembles: twenty-five feet wide on the line of the rue du Cimetière by seventy feet deep, bounded in front toward the cemetery, behind by Jean Chaperon the elder, and at the sides by Jean Guilbert dit Laframboise and Léonard Simon. The act styles her "Françoise Bizelan veuve de feu Pierre Marsan dit Lapierre", present and accepting in her own person — two months after her marriage to André Corbeil, with no mention of him. She did not sign.

28 September 1693 — the accord. Six months later Françoise appeared again before Adhémar, this time "deuement authorisée" by her husband as the Coutume required, opposite her eldest daughter Marie Cambin and Marie's husband Antoine Galipeau. The act recites that the late Laurent Cambin had left as his whole estate a concession on the côte Sainte-Anne, in the parish of Saint-Enfant-Jésus, granted to him by the abbé de Queylus on 8 January 1670 — four months before he died — abutting the St Lawrence in front, ungranted land behind, and the lands of Pierre Jannot dit Lachapelle and Léonard Simon at the sides.

Then comes the clause that ties the whole case together. Half of that concession, the act says, belonged to Françoise "à cause de la communauté contractée par le contrat de mariage dudit deffunt Cambin et d'elle ladite Baizela, passé devant Me Jean Lecomte notaire royal à Québec le quatorsiesme jour d'aoust mil six cens soixante huit" — and out of it she claimed the three hundred livres she had brought to the marriage, together with her préciput and her douaire coutumier.

Marie Cambin, "seule héritière de son père", resisted. Her mother had no claim, she and her husband argued, on whatever property the late Cambin had left in France. Françoise replied that he had told her before the wedding that he had more than a thousand livres of goods there. The colonial land, appraised, was worth no more than three hundred and fifty livres. In the end Françoise took fifty livres in two annual instalments and renounced everything else. Both parties declared they could not write or sign; Marie Cambin ratified the agreement separately before the same notary that November, and could not sign then either.

Evidence Analysis This is the single most useful discovery for understanding what followed. It shows that the 1668 marriage contract was not background but working law: its préciput, its dower and its community were argued clause by clause in 1693, and the notary cited the contract by name, place and date. It also shows Françoise as a litigant against her own child, and settling for a fraction of what she claimed. And it sets up a puzzle the sources have not yet resolved: in March she contracted alone as Marsan's widow, in September as a wife duly authorised by her husband. Both acts are before the same notary, six months apart.
June 7, 1694 — One week after the burial
Phase 5

The Three-Family Transaction

June 7, 1694 — Before the Notaires Royaux, Ville-Marie

With the guardianship formally established, the three families assembled before the royal notaries Bénigne Basset and Claude Maugue at Ville-Marie on 7 June 1694. The cover sheet — "Transaction entre les héritiers feu Cambin, Mersan et Françoise Bizelan," No. 2226 — announces the scope of what follows: not one inheritance but three, intertwined across twenty-six years of colonial life.

The act identifies the parties with care. André Gourbeil appears as widower of the late Françoise Bizelan, in his own name and holding power for François his infant son. Antoine Galipeau and Marie Cambin appear for the first marriage, in their own name and for their minor daughters. Gilles Marin appears for his wife Françoise Mersan, and Jean-Baptiste Dufresne acts for the five minor Marsan children — Antoinette, Jeanne, François, Jean and Joseph. All are assisted by Messire François Seguenot, priest of the Seminary of Saint-Sulpice and curé of the parish, and by Antoine du Fresne.

They transacted, the act says, "pour éviter [et] prévenir les procès qui pourroient naistre dans leurs familles, à cause qu'il [y a des enfants] de ses trois mariages et de chacun d'iceux" — to avoid and forestall the lawsuits that might arise within their families, because there are children of her three marriages and of each of them.

The settlement. The transaction first confirms that the accord of 28 September 1693 shall have its full force, following the appraisal of the Cambin habitation made "par arbitres et gens à ce connaissance" at three hundred and fifty livres. The three hundred livres remaining was then divided in three equal portions among Jeanne, François, Jean and Joseph Mersan and the infant François Gourbeil, payable on New Year's Day of 1695, 1696 and 1697, "en argent monnoyé, ou bled froment bon, loyal et marchand, au prix commun des marchands habituez en ce lieu" — in coined money, or in good, lawful and merchantable wheat at the common price of the merchants established in this place.

Two provisions deserve notice. Gilles Marin, for his wife Françoise Mersan, renounced her share outright, declaring himself content with what he had received from the deceased when he married her in 1685 — direct evidence that Françoise had portioned her eldest Marsan daughter in her own lifetime. And the meadow at the prairie called d'Archambault, or Sainte-Anne, which Pierre Mersan and Françoise had acquired together, was ceded to the fabrique of the parish church in payment of her burial dues and funeral service, accepted by the Seigneur in the name of the churchwardens.

In consideration, André Gourbeil undertook all the debts of the succession and kept the habitation, its building and the community's moveables as his own, subject to the ceded meadow and to a mortgage retained by Galipeau, Marin and Dufresne over everything he owned. The act was to be homologated in the royal jurisdiction within eight days. Only three men signed — Seguenot, Gilles Marin and Nicolas Senet; the rest declared they could not write.

Evidence Analysis The transaction reveals several features of colonial justice. First, the acceptance of wheat as an alternative to coin — Corbeil had no money, but the colony recognized agricultural production as equivalent to specie at the going merchant rate. Second, the three-year payment plan: the system accommodated poverty rather than forcing immediate settlement. Third, the church participated not only as spiritual authority but as a creditor with an interest, taking land for burial dues. And fourth, the phrase "pour éviter et prévenir les procès" shows the colonial preference for negotiated settlement over litigation — a preference that held for twelve years, until one grown child tested it.
1694–1697 — The church becomes a party, and a family member refuses
Phase 6

The Séguenot Compromise and the Du Fresne Exclusion

1694, ratified 24 November 1694 — continued 27 September 1697

A separate but related proceeding addressed the burial costs, and revealed the church's dual role as spiritual authority and financial stakeholder. Curé François Séguenot of Saint-Enfant-Jésus entered a formal compromis with André Gourbeille dit Tranchemontagne, Gilles Marin as tuteur, and Antoine Galipeau as curateur.

Under the compromise Séguenot took responsibility for the cost of Françoise's funeral service and inhumation, against the meadow at Sainte-Anne. The cost was to be deducted from the hundred livres Corbeil owed on 1 January 1695, and was "partagée également entre les dits six mineurs" — divided equally among the six minors, explicitly named: Antoinette, Jeanne, François, Jean and Joseph Marsan, and François Gourbeille. Corbeil's own infant son was treated exactly as his stepchildren were. The agreement was ratified on 24 November 1694 before notaries Maugue and Basset, signed by Tranchemontagne's mark, Donay, gillemarin and Séguenot.

Three years later the matter was still unfinished. Jean-Baptiste Dufresne had married Marie Renée Marsan on 23 November 1693, seven months before Françoise's death. When the burial costs came due he refused to contribute. The document is explicit: "ne pourra rien prétendre le nommé Baptiste du fresne pour avoir esposé marie Renée Mersan fille mineur des dits mersan et Bisselan attendu qu'il n'a jamais voulu consentir à payer sa part des d. service et inhumation" — he shall claim nothing, because he never agreed to pay his portion.

Séguenot references the original transaction "passée entre eux tous par devant Bénigne Basset notaire royal" and notes that his attempt to retain the meadow as security had been refused by the family. On 27 September 1697 a new assembly was called — Jean Beauchamp as churchwarden, Gourbeille, Marin and Galipeau — and a resolution reached. Séguenot personally forgave fourteen livres owed by the minors: "je leur ay fait grace de mes droits et quelques autres montant à la somme de quatorze et dont il les decharge et tient quitte." The curé absorbed the loss himself.

Evidence Analysis The Du Fresne exclusion demonstrates a principle of colonial inheritance practice: reciprocal obligation. Those who refused to share the costs of a settlement were excluded from its benefits, and Dufresne's refusal to pay a modest burial charge cost his wife her claim. Note also Séguenot's own sacrifice. Ecclesiastical mediation in colonial New France could come at a personal financial cost, and the curé who buried Françoise was still settling her funeral bill three years later, out of his own pocket.
Nine more years pass — June 25, 1706
Phase 7

The Raudot Ordonnance: A Grown Child Challenges

June 25, 1706 — Intendant Jacques Raudot, Montréal

Twelve years after his mother's death, François Marsan — now twenty-three and about to marry Marie Élisabeth Desroches — reopened the settlement. He demanded a fresh appraisal of the village lot granted to his mother on 4 March 1693, and a review of his share.

The case reached the highest colonial authority, and it took the Intendant three ordonnances to finish it. The last of the three, of 25 June 1706, recites the other two and lays out the financial history as he examined it.

31 May 1706 — the conditional order. The Intendant ruled that if the habitation André Corbeil had given Archambault in exchange — "laquelle avoit été cedée aud. andré Gourbil pour la somme de trois cens cinquante livres et à la charge de païer les dettes de la succession de françoise Bezelan et de deffunts Laurent Cambin et Pierre Mersan" — proved to be worth more than that three hundred and fifty livres together with the debts he had discharged, then Corbeil was to pay François Marsan whatever share fell to him.

9 June 1706 — the condemnation. The valuation came in above the figure, and the Intendant condemned Corbeil to pay the children of Françoise Bizelan one hundred and fifty livres — the amount by which the habitation was now estimated beyond the three hundred and fifty at which he had taken it on.

The land exchange. On 18 November 1698, in the house of Laurent Archambault in the bourg of Pointe-aux-Trembles, André Corbeil exchanged his habitation there with André Archambault for a property at Rivière-des-Prairies. The habitation he gave up is described in the act as "soixante arpents de terre" — three arpents of frontage by twenty deep — fronting the St Lawrence, bounded behind by Corbeil's own land and at one side by Pierre Jannot. The balancing payment was five hundred livres, and the act divides it: "savoir trois cents livres aux enfans mineurs deffunts" Pierre Marsan and Françoise Bizelan, in satisfaction of what Corbeil owed them under the transaction of 7 June 1694, "et le surplus de lad. somme de deux cents livres sera payée aud. Gourbeil" — with two minots of wheat besides. The children's three hundred was to be paid to them, not to him; the two hundred was the only part he saw.

Corbeil's defence. Corbeil came back with an accounting. Under the first ordonnance he was to be credited with the debts of the three successions he had already paid, and on top of those there were the forty-two livres he had paid the children "suivant l'acte du sept[ièm]e juin quatre vingt quatorze" — the transaction of 7 June 1694. Set against that, he had paid them more than the hundred and fifty already: on his reckoning the whole balance still owing to them came to thirty-four livres, one sol and six deniers. He asked to be discharged.

The ruling. The Intendant went through it — "tout veu, considéré, et toutes les pièces des parties bien examinées" — and found for Corbeil: "Nous Dechargeons led. Gourbil du paiement de lad. somme de cent cinquante livres portée par notre d. ordonnance dud. jour neuf de ce mois," the rest of the 9 June order to stand. It is dated "à Montreal ce vingt cinq juin mil sept cens six" and signed J. Raudot. Copies went out to both parties that same day.

The ordonnance survives in a notary's papers because Corbeil put it there. On 25 June he carried the Intendant's order to Antoine Adhémar's study at Ville-Marie and had it entered "au rang de mes minuttes" — lodged among the minutes, where it has stayed for three hundred and twenty years. Asked to sign the entry, he declared, as he always did, that he could not write.

François Marsan's challenge failed. The original settlement stood. Twelve years of colonial justice had run their course, and the man who began with nothing — an illiterate soldier of twenty-eight with no money — had met every obligation the system imposed.

Evidence Analysis The Raudot ordonnance offers extraordinary insight into colonial administration. The Intendant of New France — the second authority in the colony after the Governor — personally adjudicated a family inheritance dispute involving modest sums. Colonial justice was not reserved for the powerful; it reached to the household level. François Marsan's challenge also shows the long memory of inheritance claims: a child who was eleven at his mother's death could revisit the settlement twelve years later, and the notarial record-keeping that made this possible is the same archival infrastructure that allows the story to be reconstructed today.
Conclusions

What the Documents Tell Us

From one woman's death, a portrait of colonial justice

The documents of Françoise Baiselat's inheritance — from the accord of September 1693 to the Raudot ordonnance of June 1706 — reconstruct not just the division of one family's property but the functioning of an entire colonial justice system.

The system was practical rather than rigid. When Corbeil had no coin, the colony accepted wheat at the merchants' rate. When he needed to settle debts, he exchanged land. When the church came for its burial dues, it took a meadow, and then forgave part of the bill. The system accommodated poverty, illiteracy and complexity — not by lowering its standards but by finding mechanisms to meet them.

It was protective of the vulnerable. Six minor children — five from one marriage, one newborn from another — were treated as equal heirs and given formal protection through the tutelle. The subrogé tuteur created a check against conflicts of interest. And when one family member refused to share the collective obligation, the system excluded him rather than penalizing the children.

It had institutional memory. A marriage contract passed at Québec in August 1668 was still being argued clause by clause in 1693, and cited by name and date by a notary who had not been born when it was written. Twelve years after the settlement, a grown child could petition the Intendant to review the proceedings, and the Intendant could trace the payment history and rule.

And at the center of it stands Françoise Baiselat — a woman who left no written words, who appears in the record only through the men who married her, the children she bore, and the proceedings that followed her death. She was placed in service in Paris at about thirteen, crossed an ocean at about seventeen, married three soldiers, bore twelve children, sued her own daughter over a twenty-five-year-old contract, and died in childbirth at about forty-three. The system she left behind — imperfect, improvisational, but ultimately just — honored that life by protecting the children she left behind.

Sources & Citations

Notarial Records — Québec
Marriage contract of Laurent Cambain and Françoise Baisla, 14 August 1668, act no. 21, ff. 37r–38r, greffe de Jean Lecomte; Fonds Cour supérieure, district judiciaire de Québec, greffes de notaires, CN301,S169; Archives nationales à Québec, BAnQ. Digital images, BAnQ numérique, images 57–59 of 124.
Notarial Records — Montréal
Concession by the seigneurs of Pointe-aux-Trembles to Françoise Bizelan, widow of Pierre Marsan dit Lapierre, 4 March 1693, vol. V p. 175; greffe d'Antoine Adhémar dit Saint-Martin; 06M,CN601,S2; Archives nationales à Montréal, BAnQ.
Accord et conventions between André Gourbeil dit Tranchemontagne and Françoise Baisela his wife, and Antoine Galipeau and Marie Cambin his wife, 28 September 1693, vol. V p. 194, with the separate ratification of Marie Cambin in November 1693; greffe d'Antoine Adhémar; 06M,CN601,S2; BAnQ, Montréal.
Transaction entre les héritiers feu Cambin, Mersan et Françoise Bizelan, no. 2226, f. 474, 7 June 1694, before the royal notaries Bénigne Basset dit Deslauriers and Claude Maugue; greffe de Bénigne Basset; 06M,CN601,S17; BAnQ, Montréal.
Compromis concerning the burial costs of Françoise Bisselan, 1694, ratified 24 November 1694; greffe de Maugue et Basset; BAnQ, Montréal. Continuation and Du Fresne exclusion, 27 September 1697.
Exchange between André Corbeil and André Archambault, 18 November 1698; greffes de notaires, BAnQ, Montréal.
Ordonnance of Intendant Jacques Raudot, 25 June 1706, attested by notary Antoine Adhémar; greffe d'Antoine Adhémar dit Saint-Martin, 1668–1714; Fonds Cour supérieure, district judiciaire de Montréal, greffes de notaires, 06M,CN601,S2; BAnQ, Montréal.
Notarial Records — Paris (Minutier central des notaires de Paris, Archives nationales)
Marriage contract of Benjamin Baiselat and Claude Prou, 11 June 1649, before Jacques Roussel I and Michel Desprez, Étude LXXXI.
Inventaire après décès de Benjamin Baiselat, 10 February 1662, before Pierre Gary and Adrien Dupuis, Étude LXIX.
Service contract of Françoise Baiselat, 27 July 1664, before Louis Giron, Étude CII, 57.
The three Paris acts are cited here as abstracted and transcribed by Jean-Paul Macouin; the originals have not been examined.
Court & Guardianship Records
Tutelle des enfants mineurs de feu Pierre Marsan et Françoise Baiselat, June 1694 (5 pages); Bailliage de Montréal; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, Montréal.
Parish Registers
Burial of Françoise Bizelan and baptism of François Gourbeil, 30 May 1694; Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles.
Marriage of Laurent Cambin and Françoise Baiselat, 16 August 1668; Notre-Dame-de-Québec.
Marriage of Pierre Marsan and Françoise Baiselat, 22 September 1670; Notre-Dame-de-Québec.
Marriage of André Corbeil and Françoise Bizelon, 4 January 1693; Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles.
Burial of Laurent Cambin, 5 May 1670; Notre-Dame-de-Montréal.
Baptism of Jeanne Mersan, 2 January 1680; Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles.
Marriage of Antoine Galipeau and Marie Cambin, 19 July 1688; Saint-Enfant-Jésus, Pointe-aux-Trembles.
Census Records
Census of 1681, Pointe-aux-Trembles: Pierre Marsan and Françoise Baiselat household — six arpents of cleared land, three cattle.
Database Records
Programme de recherche en démographie historique (PRDH-IGD), Université de Montréal; French interface. Individual records nos. 11941 (Bizelan), 54664 (Marsan), 32499 (André Corbeil), 32500 (François Corbeil), 38208 (Cambin), 38501 (Jeanne Marsan). Marriage records nos. 66778 (Cambin–Baisela), 66943 (Mersan–Baizela), 11476 (Galipeau–Cambin), 11494 (Corbeil–Bizelon), 11534 (Cadieux–Mersan). Burial records nos. 11824 (Bizelan), 48912 (Cambin). Baptism records nos. 39991 (Marie Françoise Cambin), 10138 (Jeanne Mersan), 10431 (François Gourbeil). Family records nos. 2497 (Cambin–Bizelan), 3334 (Marsan–Bizelan). Accessed 19 September 2026.
Denis Beauregard, Genealogy of the French in North America (GFNA/FrancoGène), couple records [801] Cambin–Bizelan, [1596] Marsan–Bizelan, [4705] Bizelan–Proulx, [6403] Corbeil–Bizelan. Accessed 19 September 2026.
Fichier Origine, fiche no. 310120, "BAISELOT / BAISELAT, Françoise"; researcher Jean-Paul Macouin. Accessed 19 September 2026.
Published Works
Jean-Paul Macouin, Les familles pionnières de la Nouvelle-France dans les archives du Minutier central des notaires de Paris, présentées et annotées par Marcel Fournier (Société de recherche historique Archiv-Histo), entry 25, pp. 23–24.
M. Chabaud, in Mémoires de la Société généalogique canadienne-française (1948), no. 3, pp. 139–140 — for the baptism of Laurent Cambin at Saint-Agricol, Avignon.
Société d'Histoire des Filles du Roy, Les Filles du Roy, Pionnières de Montréal (Septentrion).