Document Gallery

What This Proves:

The absence of Owen's baptismal record reflects documented gaps in Irish Catholic parish records during the Great Famine (1845-1852). Records from Donaghmoyne parish for this period are incomplete. Birth year 1847 is consistently calculated from multiple census enumerations showing ages ranging from 32 (1880) to 18 (1861) and death record (1898, age 51). The systematic search demonstrates reasonably exhaustive research and establishes why alternative sources (sibling records, marriage records, death records, DNA evidence) must be used for parental identification.

What This Proves:

Critical Discovery: This census enumeration documents the blended family structure that solved the William Thornton mystery. The household includes: Pat Thornton (head), M Thornton (wife - Mary McMahon), O Hamel (Owen, age 18, apprentice), M Hamel (Mary Ann, age 8), and Wm Thornton (William, age 5). This single record proves: (1) Owen and Mary Ann are siblings living together, (2) Mary McMahon remarried Patrick Thornton after Henry Hamall's death, (3) William Thornton is Owen's half-brother through their mother's remarriage, (4) The family emigrated from Ireland to Montreal by 1861, (5) Owen was working as an apprentice at age 18. This census provides the foundational evidence for understanding the half-brother relationship that would later explain the mysterious "Hammil, Thornton" listing in the 1880 U.S. Census.

What This Proves:

Owen's naturalization process began in Minnesota (1868) before completing in Illinois (1872), documenting his migration pattern from Canada to the United States. This proves: (1) Owen lived in Minnesota before settling in Chicago, (2) He intended to become a U.S. citizen, (3) His migration followed typical patterns of Irish immigrants seeking industrial work, (4) The four-year gap between declaration and final papers was typical of the era's naturalization process. This fills a critical gap in Owen's timeline between the 1861 Canadian census and his appearance in Chicago records by the mid-1870s.

What This Proves:

Owen completed his naturalization in Cook County, Illinois, confirming his permanent settlement in Chicago by 1872. This document proves: (1) Owen was a naturalized U.S. citizen, (2) He had moved from Minnesota to Illinois by 1872, (3) He established residence in Cook County seven years before his 1879 marriage to Kate, (4) His legal status as a citizen would have affected his voting rights (confirmed by later voter registrations 1888, 1892). The naturalization completion in Chicago rather than Minnesota demonstrates his commitment to permanent residence in Illinois.

What This Proves:

City directories document Owen's continuous Chicago residence for 23 years (1874-1897) and track residential moves throughout his adult life. Multiple entries prove: (1) Occupation consistently listed as "molder" or "iron molder" throughout his career, (2) Residential addresses changed multiple times (Desplaines Street area, West 14th Street, etc.), reflecting typical working-class mobility, (3) His presence in Chicago directories every few years fills gaps between census enumerations, (4) The 1897 directory shows his last appearance in published records before his February 1898 death, (5) Address patterns align with cemetery records and children's birth/death certificates. The consistent occupation listing validates census and marriage record information. The final 1897 entry contextualizes his appearance on the Tribune's "Destitute List" the same year—a skilled tradesman who had fallen into poverty.

What These Records Prove:

Marriage Details: Owen Hamall married Catherine "Kate" Griffith on August 13, 1879, at Holy Name Cathedral in Chicago. The Cook County certificate shows Owen was age 31 and Catherine was age 24 at the time of marriage, calculating Owen's birth to approximately 1848 and Kate's to approximately 1855.

Dual Documentation Value: Having both church and civil records provides redundant proof and cross-verification. The church register shows the sacramental marriage ("Holy Matrimony"), while the Cook County certificate documents the civil/legal marriage. The presence of both records strengthens the evidence and allows comparison of details.

Family Connections: Kate's maiden name Griffith is confirmed in both records, connecting her to the Griffith family network in Chicago, particularly her mother Eliza Reynolds Griffith (who purchased the cemetery plot in 1870 where Owen and the four deceased children would later be buried).

Timeline Context: The August 1879 marriage occurred approximately 10 months before the 1880 census enumeration that showed Owen, Kate, newborn Thomas Henry, and the mysterious "Thornton Hammil" (William Thornton) living together. This means Kate was likely pregnant at the time of the 1880 census (June enumeration, Thomas born September 1880).

Spelling Variants: The church record shows "Catharine" while the civil record shows "Catherine" - both are correct variants of Kate's name. The family primarily used "Catherine" or "Kate" in later documents.

Religious Identity: Marriage at Holy Name Cathedral (Chicago's primary Irish Catholic cathedral) confirms the family's Catholic identity and integration into Chicago's Irish immigrant community.

Long-term Significance: This marriage would last 19 years until Owen's death in 1898, followed by Kate's 21-year widowhood until her own death in 1919. The couple would have six children, four of whom died between 1892-1893.

What This Proves:

The Central Mystery Document: This census enumeration launched the seven-year research investigation (2018-2024). The household includes Owen Hamall (age 32, iron molder, born Ireland), Kate Hamall (age 28, born Ireland), Thomas Hamall (infant son, born Illinois), and critically: "Hammil, Thornton" (age 24, born Canada, relationship: "brother").

The Name Recording Error: The listing "Hammil, Thornton" represents the census enumerator's error in recording William Thornton. The enumerator wrote William under Owen's surname (Hammil/Hamill) with "Thornton" appearing as a given name rather than recognizing it as a separate surname. This created the name "Thornton Hammil" which appeared nowhere else in any historical records, making traditional surname searches impossible.

What the Census Proves:

• William Thornton was living with Owen's family in June 1880, three years before the reciprocal baptism sponsorships (1883)
• The relationship was close enough for co-residence - William could have lived independently as a 24-year-old but chose to live with his half-brother's family
• William was approximately 24 years old in 1880 (born circa 1856), consistent with his 1856 birth in Montreal after Mary McMahon's 1855 remarriage to Patrick Thornton
• The enumerator listed him as "brother" - technically imprecise (half-brother) but socially accurate, as they grew up together in the blended household
• William's birthplace is correctly noted as Canada, distinguishing him from Owen (born Ireland)
• Owen worked as an iron molder - a skilled trade confirmed by Chicago city directories across multiple decades

Why This Census Was So Difficult to Solve: The mystery persisted for six years because searches for "Thornton Hamall," "Thornton Hammil," or any surname variant produced no results. The actual person (William Thornton, first name William, surname Thornton) could not be connected through traditional genealogical methods. The breakthrough finally came in March 2024 when an 1883 baptism record showed William Thornton as sponsor for Owen's son, revealing the reciprocal family relationship pattern.

Historical Context: This census enumeration occurred just 10 months after Owen and Kate's August 1879 marriage and shows their household at the beginning of family formation. Thomas Henry (the infant shown here) would survive to adulthood, but four more children born after this census would die between 1892-1893.

What This Proves:

Owen's voter registration confirms: (1) He exercised his citizenship rights following naturalization, (2) He was living at a specific Chicago address in 1888, (3) Occupation listed as "molder" consistent with other records, (4) He met residency requirements for voting (connected to Cook County), (5) His civic participation demonstrates integration into American society. This fills gaps between censuses (1880-1900) and provides evidence of continued Chicago residence during the period when his children were born and some died.

What This Proves:

Owen's second documented voter registration in 1892 proves continued residence and voting rights exercise. Significantly, this registration occurred: (1) The same year his daughter Katie died (July 1892), (2) The year his son Eugene was born (May 1892), (3) Just months before the devastating spring 1893 deaths of three more children. The registration documents normal civic life continuing even as family tragedy unfolded. It also confirms his address and occupation remained stable through the early 1890s despite later economic collapse.

What This Proves:

This devastating newspaper listing documents Owen's complete economic collapse in the year before his death. The entry lists Owen Hamall as: blind, unable to work, wife and children destitute. This proves: (1) Owen became blind sometime between his last employment and 1897, (2) Blindness ended his ability to work as an iron molder (a trade requiring sight), (3) The family descended into extreme poverty requiring charitable intervention, (4) The listing was published to solicit donations for destitute families, (5) Owen's appearance in this list contextualizes his death just one year later (February 1898) and Kate's subsequent 21 years of widowed poverty. The progression from skilled tradesman (city directories through 1897) to blind and destitute (1897) to dead (1898) illustrates how quickly industrial workers could fall into poverty when disability struck.

What This Proves:

Owen's death certificate provides definitive end-of-life documentation: (1) Date of death: February 4, 1898, (2) Age at death: 51 years (consistent with estimated 1847 birth), (3) Cause of death: Meningitis, (4) Location: Chicago, Illinois, (5) Informant likely Kate Hamall (widow). The death certificate confirms the timeline: born ~1847 Ireland, emigrated ~1850 to Canada, moved to U.S. by 1868, married 1879, father of six children (four died 1892-1893), blind and destitute by 1897, died 1898 leaving widow and two surviving children. Owen's death at age 51 from meningitis (likely related to poor living conditions and weakened health from blindness/poverty) left Kate a widow for 21 years until her own death in 1919.

What This Proves:

Cemetery records prove: (1) Owen was buried in the same plot as his four deceased children (William, Lizzie, Katie, Eugene), (2) The plot was purchased by Kate's mother, Eliza Reynolds Griffith, on May 27, 1870 (eight years before Owen's marriage to Kate), (3) Owen's burial location: Lot 17, Block 14, Section D, Calvary Cemetery, (4) The plot would later hold Kate when she died in 1919. The cemetery documentation connects Owen to the extended Griffith family network and demonstrates how working-class families relied on extended family for burial arrangements. The fact that Kate's mother (not Owen himself) purchased the plot in 1870 suggests the Griffith family had more economic resources than the Hamall family.

What This Proves:

BREAKTHROUGH DOCUMENT: This baptism record solved the seven-year mystery by documenting William Thornton as godfather/sponsor for Owen's son William. This reciprocal sponsorship (William Thornton sponsored Owen's son; Owen sponsored William Thornton's daughter the same year) provided definitive proof of the half-brother relationship. The baptism occurred two months after William's birth (born January 16, baptized March 25), typical of Catholic practice. The choice of William Thornton as godfather demonstrates the close relationship between the half-brothers just three years after William lived with Owen's family (1880 census). Parents listed: Owen Hamall and Catherine Griffith.

What This Proves:

William died April 29, 1893, at age 10 years, 3 months from pneumonia. Address: 302 Desplaines Street. This was the fourth and final child to die in the spring 1893 tragedy: Lizzie died March 30, Eugene died March 31, and William died April 29—three children within 30 days. The death certificate confirms: (1) Cause: pneumonia (common childhood killer before antibiotics), (2) Residential address had changed from West 14th Street (1883) to Desplaines Street, (3) Owen was still living (listed as father on death certificate), (4) The family was intact at time of death but experiencing devastating loss.

What This Proves:

William was buried May 2, 1893 (three days after death) in the same plot with his siblings. The cemetery card documents the family's use of the plot purchased by Eliza Reynolds Griffith. All four children who died 1892-1893 were buried in this same plot, along with Owen (1898) and Kate (1919). The rapid burial (3 days) was typical for the era before modern embalming.

What This Documentation Proves:

Primary Evidence - Baptism Record: Elizabeth's baptism record provides primary evidence of her birth in 1887, naming parents Owen Hamall and Catherine Griffith. Catholic baptism records serve as reliable alternative sources when civil birth certificates are unavailable. The baptism typically occurred within days or weeks of birth, making the sacramental record contemporaneous with the birth event.

Negative Evidence - No Certificate Found: The Cook County Clerk's official "No Record Found" response demonstrates incomplete Chicago vital records for the 1880s. This negative search result is valuable evidence because it: (1) Documents that a thorough search was conducted in the official repository, (2) Confirms birth registration was incomplete during this period, (3) Demonstrates reasonably exhaustive research by showing what was searched and not found.

The FamilySearch Discrepancy: The FamilySearch database shows an indexed birth entry for Elizabeth Hamall (20 March 1887) despite the Cook County Clerk's "no record" response. This discrepancy suggests several possibilities:

• FamilySearch may have indexed records from a different repository (delayed registrations, church records, hospital records) that the Clerk's office doesn't maintain
• The original certificate may have been misfiled, damaged, or lost between FamilySearch's indexing and the later search request
• FamilySearch indexes both official certificates and alternative birth documentation, while the Clerk's office searches only official certificates
• The index entry may be based on delayed or amended registrations not in the main birth certificate files

Birth Date Validation: Lizzie's birth date is validated through multiple sources: (1) Death certificate listing age "6 years, 0 days" at death March 30, 1893, calculating birth to March 30, 1887, (2) FamilySearch index showing birth date March 20, 1887 (10 days earlier - possibly baptism confusion), (3) Cemetery record confirming 1893 death at age 6. The slight date discrepancy (March 20 vs March 30) is common and may reflect confusion between birth and baptism dates.

Research Methodology Demonstration: This source set demonstrates professional genealogical methodology: (1) Using alternative primary sources (baptism) when preferred sources unavailable, (2) Documenting negative search results to show exhaustive research, (3) Identifying and explaining record discrepancies rather than ignoring them, (4) Using multiple record types to cross-validate birth information.

Historical Context: The missing birth certificate reflects common challenges in 19th-century urban research. Chicago birth registration was not mandatory or consistently enforced in the 1880s. Home births without physician attendance often went unregistered. Immigrant families may have prioritized religious sacraments (baptism) over civil registration. Record loss through fires, floods, and poor preservation also contributes to gaps in official vital records.

Significance for Family Story: Lizzie would die on March 30, 1893 - exactly six years after her birth (if March 30, 1887 is correct) or just after turning six (if March 20, 1887 is correct). She died on what may have been her sixth birthday, adding poignancy to the tragedy. She was the first of three children to die in the "Spring of Death" 1893, followed by her brothers Eugene (March 31) and William (April 29).

What This Proves:

Lizzie died March 30, 1893—tragically, on her sixth birthday. Age listed: "6 years, 0 days" confirming birth date March 30, 1887. Address: 302 Desplaines Street (same as William's death certificate one month later). She was the second child to die in the spring 1893 cluster (Katie died July 1892, Lizzie March 30, Eugene March 31, William April 29). The death certificate documents: (1) Cause of death, (2) Parents: Owen and Catherine Hamall, (3) Residence, (4) The devastating coincidence of dying on her exact birthday. The certificate establishes Lizzie's existence despite absence of birth record.

What This Proves:

Lizzie's baptism record confirms her parents (Owen Hamall and Catherine Griffith) and provides documentation of her existence independent of the death certificate. Baptismal sponsors would indicate family relationships and social networks.

What This Proves:

Lizzie was buried March 31, 1893 (one day after death) in the family plot. The burial immediately followed her brother Eugene's burial the same day—two children buried together on March 31. Address listed: 302 Desplaines Street. The cemetery card provides additional confirmation of Lizzie's existence and documents the rapid burial typical of the era.

What This Proves:

Katie's complete documentation provides the fullest record set of the four deceased children. Born December 28, 1889, she died July 29, 1892 at age 2 years, 7 months. Katie died before the spring 1893 cluster that killed her three siblings, making her the first of the four to die. Her death predated Eugene's birth by just months—Kate gave birth to Eugene (May 1892) while grieving Katie's death (July 1892), only to lose Eugene eight months later (March 1893). The Tribune obituary notice demonstrates the family was respectable enough to afford a death notice, suggesting their economic decline occurred after 1892. Address: 302 Desplaines Street (consistent with later death certificates). Katie's burial in the family plot began the tragic accumulation that would include three more siblings within 9 months, then Owen (1898), and finally Kate (1919).

What This Proves:

Eugene was Owen and Kate's youngest child, born approximately May 28, 1892 (baptized June 9, 1892). He died March 31, 1893 at age 10 months. The cemetery card lists him as "Owen Hamall 10m&s" (10 months and some days). Eugene died the same day as Lizzie (March 31) and one day after Lizzie's sixth birthday death (March 30). The baptism record just two weeks after birth suggests concerns about infant health. Eugene's death certificate confirms address: 302 Desplaines Street. His short life (born during Katie's final illness, died with Lizzie) encapsulates the family tragedy—parents losing child after child in rapid succession. Eugene never appears in any census record, born and died between 1890 and 1900 enumerations.

What This Proves:

Thomas Henry was Owen and Kate's first child, born 1880 (one year after their 1879 marriage). He appears as an infant in the 1880 census that also lists "Hammil, Thornton" (William Thornton). Thomas Henry was the researcher's direct ancestor, surviving to 1938. His survival (along with sister Mary) contrasts with the four siblings who died 1892-1893. Thomas Henry's birth record establishes the beginning of Owen and Kate's family, and his survival to middle age demonstrates the dramatic difference in mortality between children who survived past early childhood versus those who died young in the disease-ridden 1890s Chicago.

What This Proves:

Mary Hamall (born 1885) survived to age 74, dying in 1959. She was Owen and Kate's second surviving child (along with Thomas Henry). Her long life demonstrates the mortality divide between surviving siblings and those who died young. Mary lived through: (1) The deaths of four siblings (1892-1893), (2) Her father's death (1898) when she was 13, (3) Her mother's death (1919) when she was 34, (4) Her brother Thomas Henry's death (1938). Mary's survival and marriage (surname Holland) extended the Hamall family line through the 20th century. Her 1959 death occurred 61 years after her father Owen's death, spanning from Victorian Chicago to mid-20th century America.

What This Proves:

Kate (age 47, widowed) was living at 201 Washburne Avenue with her mother Elizabeth Griffith and brother John Griffith in 1900. This proves: (1) Kate survived Owen's death by two years, (2) She relied on extended family (mother and brother) for housing and support, (3) Economic circumstances prevented independent living, (4) Her surviving children Thomas Henry and Mary were no longer in the household (likely working or established independently), (5) The address (201 Washburne) shows a move from the Desplaines Street area where the children died. Kate's living situation demonstrates how working-class widows depended on family networks. She would live another 19 years (1900-1919) before dying at Chicago State Hospital.

What This Proves:

Kate died in 1919 at Chicago State Hospital from tuberculosis after 21 years of widowhood. Chicago State Hospital was an institution for indigent patients with mental illness or severe medical conditions, indicating Kate's continued poverty. Her death proves: (1) She outlived Owen by 21 years, (2) Economic circumstances never improved—she died in a charity hospital, (3) Tuberculosis (common among poor urban residents in crowded housing) was cause of death, (4) She was approximately 68 years old at death. Kate's death ended the tragic story that began with her marriage to Owen in 1879, included the loss of four children (1892-1893), Owen's blindness and death (1898), and 21 years of widowed poverty. She was buried in the same Calvary Cemetery plot with Owen and their four deceased children—the plot purchased by her mother Eliza Reynolds Griffith in 1870.

What This Proves:

Kate's mother, Eliza Reynolds Griffith, purchased the cemetery plot on May 27, 1870—nine years before Kate married Owen (1879). This critical document proves: (1) Kate's mother's full name: Eliza Reynolds Griffith, (2) The Griffith family had sufficient resources to purchase burial plots, (3) The plot was purchased before Kate's marriage, suggesting Griffith family foresight, (4) This plot would eventually hold six people: Katie (1892), Eugene (1893), Lizzie (1893), William (1893), Owen (1898), and Kate (1919). The purchase demonstrates how working-class families relied on extended family resources for burial arrangements. The fact that Kate's mother (not Owen) owned the plot explains how the indigent Hamall family could afford to bury multiple children and both parents—the plot was already secured by the Griffith family.

What This Proves:

Thomas Eugene Hamall (1904-1967) was the son of Thomas Henry Hamall (Owen's grandson, not son). His death in 1967 Florida at age 63 extends the documented family history to the late 20th century. Thomas Eugene's survival to 1967 represents Generation 4 of the family documented in this case study. He was born 6 years after Owen's death (1898) and lived through massive historical changes: two world wars, the Great Depression, post-war prosperity. His generation benefited from public health improvements (antibiotics, vaccines, sanitation) that prevented the childhood mortality that killed his great-aunt and great-uncles in 1892-1893. The 1967 endpoint provides a 126-year span of documented family history (1841-1967).

What This Document Proves - THE BREAKTHROUGH EVIDENCE:

This baptism record is THE KEY DOCUMENT that definitively proves William Thornton was Owen Hamall's half-brother through their shared mother, Mary McMahon.

The Critical Evidence Chain:

1. This baptism record (c. 1856) names Mary McMahon as William Thornton's mother and Patrick Thornton as his father.
2. The 1855 marriage record (Source #49) shows Mary McMahon (explicitly identified as "widow of Henry Hamall") married Patrick Thornton in Montreal.
3. The 1841 marriage record (Source #44) shows Mary McMahon married Henry Hamall in Donaghmoyne, Ireland.
4. Owen's 1898 death certificate and sister Mary Ann's records name Henry Hamall and Mary McMahon as parents.
5. Therefore: Owen Hamall and William Thornton shared the same mother (Mary McMahon) but had different fathers (Henry Hamall vs. Patrick Thornton) = half-brothers.

Why This Document Was Essential to Solving the Mystery: For six years (2018-2024), the identity of "Thornton Hammil" in the 1880 census remained unsolved. Traditional surname searches failed because the census had recorded William under Owen's surname. The breakthrough came when:

• The 1883 baptism records (Sources #27-28) showed reciprocal sponsorship between Owen and William
• This proved a close family relationship but didn't explain the different surnames
• This baptism record provided the missing link by naming Mary McMahon as mother
• The 1855 marriage record then connected Mary McMahon (widow) to Patrick Thornton
• The entire family structure suddenly became clear: blended family from maternal remarriage

Contemporaneous Evidence: Baptism records created within days or weeks of birth are considered highly reliable primary sources. The priest who performed the baptism recorded the parents' names based on direct testimony from the family, making this contemporaneous documentation of William's parentage. The record was created circa 1856 (William born c. 1856 based on 1861 census age 5), just one year after Mary's 1855 remarriage to Patrick Thornton.

The 1861 Census Validation (Source #31): This baptism record is validated by the 1861 Canadian census showing the blended household: Patrick Thornton (head), M Thornton (Mary, wife), O Hamel (Owen, son from first marriage), M Hamel (Mary Ann, daughter from first marriage), and Wm Thornton (William, son from second marriage). The census captured the family six years after Mary's remarriage and five years after William's birth, showing all family members living together.

Quebec French-Language Records: Quebec baptismal records were maintained in French by Catholic priests and are among the most complete genealogical records in North America. The systematic record-keeping by Quebec parishes makes these records highly reliable for establishing family relationships, particularly for Irish Catholic immigrants who settled in Montreal during the Great Famine period.

Research Methodology Significance: This case demonstrates why international research is essential for immigrant families. The crucial evidence connecting Owen and William was not in U.S. records (Chicago) but in Canadian records (Quebec). Limiting research to the destination country (United States) would have left the mystery permanently unsolved. The breakthrough required:

• Recognizing the different surname as potential remarriage indicator
• Systematic searching of Canadian records (Montreal area)
• Understanding Quebec Catholic record-keeping practices
• Connecting multiple record types across decades and countries

The Complete Proof: Combined with the 1855 marriage record showing Mary as "widow of Henry Hamall," this baptism record provides definitive proof of the half-brother relationship. No other explanation fits the evidence: same mother (Mary McMahon), different fathers (Henry Hamall died 1854, Patrick Thornton married Mary 1855, William born 1856), different surnames (Hamall vs. Thornton), but raised together (1861 census), maintained close relationship into adulthood (1880 co-residence, 1883 reciprocal sponsorships).

What This Document Proves:

The Critical Parental Notation: The marriage record explicitly states William was "fils majeur de Patrick Thornton et de défunte Mary McMahon" — meaning "adult son of Patrick Thornton and of the deceased Mary McMahon." This single phrase provides multiple pieces of crucial evidence:

1. Confirms Patrick Thornton as father - Validates the baptism record (Source #48)
2. Confirms Mary McMahon as mother - The KEY connection to Owen Hamall through shared mother
3. Documents Mary's death before 1881 - The notation "défunte" (deceased) confirms Mary had died before William's marriage on August 20, 1881
4. Validates 1874 death date - Mary McMahon died September 19, 1874 in Montreal (Source #51), seven years before this 1881 marriage
5. Shows Patrick Thornton still living in 1881 - Patrick is not noted as deceased, indicating he was alive when William married

Timeline Validation: This marriage record provides a chronological checkpoint validating the entire family timeline:

• 1841: Mary McMahon married Henry Hamall (first marriage) - Source #44
• 1854: Henry Hamall died, leaving Mary widowed
• 1855: Mary McMahon (widow of Henry Hamall) married Patrick Thornton - Source #50
• c. 1856: William Thornton born (baptism Source #48 names Mary McMahon as mother)
• 1874: Mary McMahon died in Montreal - Source #51
• 1881: THIS RECORD confirms Mary was deceased by William's marriage

Marriage Details: William Thornton (age 24-25, born c. 1856) married Mary Jane Lynch on August 20, 1881, in Granby, Quebec. Granby is located about 50 miles east of Montreal in the Eastern Townships, suggesting William maintained Quebec connections even after spending time in Chicago (the 1880 census showed him living with Owen in Chicago one year earlier).

Geographic Pattern: The marriage location (Granby, Quebec) rather than Chicago suggests:

• William returned to Quebec area where he was born and raised
• Mary Jane Lynch was likely from Quebec, possibly from the Granby area
• William maintained strong Canadian ties despite time in United States
• The couple would later return to Chicago, where their children were born and died (1883-1886)

"Fils Majeur" Notation: The French phrase "fils majeur" translates as "adult son" or "son of legal age" (21+ years old). This notation confirms William was old enough to marry without parental consent. At age 24-25, he was well past the age of majority.

Connection to Owen Hamall Timeline: William's 1881 marriage occurred just two years after Owen's 1879 marriage to Kate Griffith (Source #19). The half-brothers were establishing their own families at approximately the same time: Owen married at age 31-32, William at age 24-25. This parallel timing may explain their continued close relationship documented in reciprocal baptismal sponsorships just two years later (1883, Sources #27-28).

Mary Jane Lynch: William's bride, Mary Jane Lynch, would become Mary Jane Thornton. After losing all three of their children by 1886 (Sources #54-56), and after William's death in 1900, Mary Jane would remarry and become Mary Jane St. Pierre. The 1900 census (Source #50) captured Mary Jane as William's widow just months before his death, noting the tragic "3 children, 0 living."

Research Significance: This marriage record demonstrates the value of examining parental notations in marriage registers. The simple phrase "défunte Mary McMahon" (deceased Mary McMahon) provides independent validation of Mary's death date and confirms the accuracy of the Montreal death record seven years earlier. Quebec marriage records routinely noted whether parents were living or deceased, making them valuable sources for establishing family timelines.

The Tragic Future: This 1881 marriage, celebrated in Granby, Quebec, would produce three children—none of whom would survive to adulthood. Within five years of this wedding day, William and Mary Jane would bury all three children in Chicago (Mary M. and Eugene M. died within 20 days of each other in summer 1886). The parallel tragedies of the two half-brothers' families—Owen lost four children 1892-1893, William lost three children by 1886—created devastating losses for both branches of Mary McMahon's family.

What This Proves:

KEY RECIPROCAL SPONSORSHIP DOCUMENT: Mary Margaret was William Thornton's daughter, and Owen Hamall served as her godfather/sponsor. This reciprocal sponsorship (Owen sponsored William's daughter Mary; William sponsored Owen's son William) provides definitive proof of the close family relationship. The mutual sponsorship pattern was typical of brothers. This baptism occurred the same year (1883) as Owen's son William's baptism, demonstrating coordinated family religious practices. Parents: William Thornton and Mary Lynch Thornton. Mary Margaret would die in 1886 at age 3, becoming the first of William's three children to die.

What This Proves:

Mary M. Thornton died July 31, 1886 at age 3 years, 2 months, 4 days. She was the first of William and Mary's children to die in the "Summer of Sorrow 1886." Her death began the parallel tragedy that would mirror Owen and Kate's losses six years later. Death certificate proves: (1) Parents: William Thornton and Mary Thornton, (2) Exact age calculation gives birth date approximately May 27, 1883 (consistent with baptism record from 1883), (3) Cause of death [listed on certificate], (4) Residence in Chicago. Mary M. was buried August 2, 1886 at Calvary Cemetery—just two days after death and 18 days before her brother Eugene M. would die.

What This Proves:

Eugene M. Thornton died August 20, 1886 at age 1 year, 4 months, 22 days—just 20 days after his sister Mary M. died. This was the "Summer of Sorrow 1886" when William and Mary lost two children in three weeks. Eugene's death proves: (1) Parents: William Thornton and Mary Thornton, (2) Birth date approximately March 28, 1885, (3) The family experienced rapid succession deaths similar to Owen's family losses (1892-1893), (4) Cause of death [listed on certificate], likely epidemic disease. Eugene was buried at Calvary Cemetery. The 1900 census states "3 children, 0 living," meaning a third child died at some point (before 1886, between 1886-1900, or unreported), but only Mary M. and Eugene M. have located death certificates.

What This Proves:

William Thornton (age 44, laborer) lived with wife Mary and two nieces in 1900. Critical notation: "3 children, 0 living"—William lost all three of his children, mirroring Owen's tragedy. This census proves: (1) William survived to 1900 (he would die later that year in September), (2) His occupation: laborer (working-class like Owen), (3) He and Mary took in two nieces (extended family support network), (4) The notation "3 children, 0 living" confirms three children were born but all died, (5) Only two deaths documented (Mary M. 1886, Eugene M. 1886), meaning third child's death record hasn't been found. The census was taken months before William's death in September 1900, making it his last documented appearance alive. The parallel to Owen's losses (4 of 6 children died) demonstrates the devastating child mortality among working-class immigrant families in late 19th century Chicago.

What This Proves:

William Thornton died September 10, 1900 and was buried at Calvary Cemetery, Section T (different section than Owen who was in Section D). Cemetery card notation states he died in Metropolis, Illinois—a town 360 miles south of Chicago on the Ohio River. This proves: (1) William died away from Chicago (reason unknown—work? travel? visiting?), (2) His body was returned to Chicago for burial, (3) He was buried in the same cemetery as Owen (though different section), demonstrating continued family connection to Calvary, (4) He died just 2 years after Owen (Owen 1898, William 1900), (5) Age approximately 44 years old. The Metropolis death creates a mystery—why was William 360 miles from home? Possibilities include seasonal work, visiting relatives, or misfortune while traveling. The cemetery burial in Chicago rather than Metropolis indicates family arranged return of body.

What This Proves:

Despite William dying in Metropolis (Massac County seat), no death certificate exists in county records. This official search result proves: (1) Reasonably exhaustive research was conducted (official repository search), (2) The absence of a death certificate doesn't disprove William's death—cemetery records confirm death, (3) Late 19th/early 20th century death registration was incomplete, especially for non-residents who died while traveling, (4) The negative result demonstrates professional research methodology (document unsuccessful searches). The absence of the certificate prevents knowing: exact cause of death, circumstances, who reported the death, his precise age. This documented negative search meets BCG standards for establishing absence of evidence while continuing to rely on available sources (cemetery records, census notation).

What This Proves:

Henry Hamall married Mary McMahon in Donaghmoyne parish, County Monaghan, Ireland in 1841. This foundational document proves: (1) Owen's parents' names and marriage location, (2) Irish origins in County Monaghan, (3) Marriage occurred 6 years before Owen's birth (1847), (4) Family was in Ireland during pre-Famine period, (5) Mary's maiden name: McMahon (critical for tracing maternal line). The 1841 marriage establishes the family in Donaghmoyne parish where Griffith's Valuation (1861) would later show multiple Hamill families in adjacent townlands. Henry and Mary would have at least four children: Mary (1847-1851), Michael (c. 1850), Owen (1847-1898), and Mary Ann (1853-1909). The family emigrated to Montreal c. 1850 during the Great Famine, where Henry died in 1854 leaving Mary a widow with four young children.

What This Proves:

DNA-VALIDATED EXTENDED FAMILY CONNECTION: Owen Hammel (NOT our Owen Hamall who was born 1847) married Ann King in Donaghmoyne in 1846. DNA testing (2024-2025) proved that this Owen Hammel & Ann King couple is biologically related to Henry Hamall & Mary McMahon (our Owen's parents). This validates: (1) The extended Hamill family network in Donaghmoyne parish, (2) Geographic clustering of related families in the same parish, (3) The tight-knit nature of the Irish community before emigration. This is the second of four interconnected Donaghmoyne marriages all proven through DNA to be part of the same extended biological family network. The surname variation (Hammel vs. Hamall) was common in Irish records. This marriage occurred five years after Henry & Mary's marriage (1841) and one year before Owen Hamall's birth (1847), demonstrating the continuity of Hamill family presence in the parish.

What This Proves:

DNA-VALIDATED EXTENDED FAMILY CONNECTION: Charles McCanna married Susan Hamill in Donaghmoyne in 1857. DNA evidence (2024-2025) confirmed this couple is biologically related to Henry Hamall & Mary McMahon. This marriage proves: (1) The Hamill surname continued in Donaghmoyne even after Henry's branch emigrated (c. 1850), (2) Susan Hamill represents another branch of the extended family, (3) The McCanna-Hamill union demonstrates intermarriage patterns in the parish. This is the third of four interconnected marriages validated by DNA. The 1857 timing (three years after Henry Hamall's death in Montreal and two years after Mary McMahon's remarriage to Patrick Thornton) shows the family network in Ireland continuing while the emigrant branch established itself in Canada. Susan Hamill's marriage into the McCanna family illustrates how the extended Hamill network remained rooted in County Monaghan through multiple family lines.

What This Proves:

DNA-VALIDATED CONNECTION — EXPLAINS GARTLAN CLUSTER: James Hamill (confirmed as the James Hamill 1827-1914 from Dian townland in Griffith's Valuation) married Anna Gartlan in Donaghmoyne parish. DNA testing (2024-2025) confirmed this couple is biologically related to Henry Hamall & Mary McMahon. This marriage is particularly significant because it explains the DNA evidence: (1) Why DNA matches cluster around both "Hamill" and "Gartlan" surnames, (2) The Gartlan connection is through the HAMILL side (James Hamill married Anna Gartlan), NOT through Kate Griffith's family, (3) This Hamill-Gartlan intermarriage created the genetic signature that appears in descendant DNA. This is the fourth of four interconnected Donaghmoyne marriages all proven by DNA to be part of one extended biological family network. The marriage validates that James Hamill (Dian) was a distant cousin of Owen, and his marriage to Anna Gartlan explains why researchers see "Gartlan" appearing in DNA matches—it's a Hamill family connection, not a Griffith connection.

What This Proves:

Mary Hamall, Owen's older sister, died in 1851 in Montreal at age 4. Born approximately 1847 (during the Great Famine in Ireland), she died shortly after the family's emigration to Canada. This proves: (1) The family had arrived in Montreal by 1851, (2) Owen had an older sister who died young, (3) The family experienced child loss even before Owen's own children died decades later, (4) Parents: Henry Hamall and Mary McMahon. Mary's death left three surviving siblings: Michael (c. 1850), Owen (1847), and Mary Ann (1853, born after this Mary's death, possibly named for her deceased sister). The death demonstrates the harsh reality of immigrant life in 1850s Montreal.

What This Proves:

CRITICAL DOCUMENT: Mary Ann's baptism record explicitly lists her parents as "Henry Hamell" and "Mary McMahon," providing contemporary documentation of Owen's parents' names. Godfather: Owen Duffy. This proves: (1) Henry and Mary were Owen's parents (confirmed through Mary Ann as Owen's sibling), (2) The family was living in Montreal by 1853, (3) Mary Ann was born March 17, 1853 (baptized April 10, 1853), (4) Henry was still alive in 1853 (he would die in 1854). Mary Ann would become critical to the case study through: (1) Her 1879 marriage record confirming parents, (2) Her descendants providing DNA matches validating the family relationships. Mary Ann lived 1853-1909, spanning from Montreal to the U.S., and her long life provided documentary and genetic evidence for Owen's parentage.

What This Proves:

Henry Hamall died in Montreal in 1854 at age 37, leaving widow Mary McMahon with four young children: Michael (c. 4), Owen (7), and Mary Ann (1). This death proves: (1) Henry's approximate birth year: 1817 (died 1854 age 37), (2) He died just 3-4 years after emigrating from Ireland, (3) Mary McMahon became a widow at approximately age 34 with three dependent children, (4) The family faced economic crisis with loss of the male breadwinner. Henry's death set in motion Mary's remarriage to Patrick Thornton in 1855, which created the blended family documented in the 1861 Canadian census and explains the half-brother relationship between Owen and William Thornton. Henry's early death also explains why Owen (age 7) grew up with a stepfather and half-siblings.

What This Proves:

CRITICAL EXPLANATION DOCUMENT: Mary McMahon (explicitly identified as "widow of Henry Hamall") married Patrick Thornton in Montreal one year after Henry's death. This marriage created the blended family and explains William Thornton's relationship to Owen. The marriage proves: (1) Mary remarried quickly after Henry's death (common for widows with young children), (2) Patrick Thornton became stepfather to Owen, Michael, and Mary Ann, (3) The marriage would produce William Thornton (born c. 1856) and possibly other children, (4) This explains the 1861 census showing "Pat Thornton" as head of household with "M Thornton" (Mary), "O Hamel" (Owen), "M Hamel" (Mary Ann), and "Wm Thornton" (William). The marriage record validates the half-brother relationship that was the central mystery of the case study. Children from both marriages were raised together in the same household.

What This Proves:

Mary Ann's marriage record states she is "daughter of age of deceased Henry Hammell and Mary McMahon." This proves: (1) Both parents were deceased by 1879 (Henry died 1854, Mary died 1874), (2) Confirms parents' names independently from baptism record, (3) Mary Ann was "of age" (21+) at marriage, (4) She married William F. Byron and remained in Montreal while Owen moved to Chicago. Mary Ann's marriage provides independent confirmation of parental names and her status as Owen's sister. Her descendants would provide the DNA matches (CR and DK, both 19 cM) that corroborated the documentary evidence establishing Henry and Mary McMahon as Owen's parents.

What This Proves:

Mary McMahon died September 19, 1874 in Montreal at approximately age 54. Burial record identifies her as "Mary McMahon, widow of the late Henry Hammel." This proves: (1) Mary's death date and location (Montreal, NOT Chicago), (2) She was identified by her first husband's name even 20 years after his death, (3) She was buried at Basilique Notre-Dame cemetery, Montreal, (4) Mary died when Owen was approximately 27 years old, before his migration to Chicago, (5) Both of Owen's parents died before his marriage to Kate (1879). The burial record's identification as "widow of Henry Hammel" demonstrates that her first marriage remained her primary identity even after 19 years of remarriage to Patrick Thornton. Owen would have been in his late twenties, possibly still in Montreal or recently moved to Minnesota/Chicago when his mother died.

What This Proves:

Griffith's Valuation documents geographic clustering of Hamill families in Donaghmoyne parish. IMPORTANT: Only James Hamill in Dian townland is confirmed as related (1827-1914, married Ann Gartlan). The Henry Hamill listed in Edengilrevy and Owen Hamill in Drumaconvern are UNKNOWN identities—they could be relatives but cannot be confirmed as our specific family members since our Henry emigrated c. 1850 and died 1854, and the Wisconsin Owen Hammel died 1858. The valuation proves: (1) Multiple Hamill families lived in adjacent townlands, (2) Geographic clustering suggests possible kinship (siblings or cousins settling near each other), (3) James Hamill in Dian is documented through DNA evidence (Gartlan family intermarriage), (4) The broader Hamill family network in Donaghmoyne provides context for Henry and Mary's Irish origins. The 1861 date is significant—11 years after Henry's family emigrated, documenting the extended family network they left behind.

What This Proves:

A Henry Hamil appears in the 1824 Tithe Applotment Books for Edengilrew townland, Donaghmoyne. Since our Henry Hamall was born approximately 1817, he would have been only 7 years old in 1824. This Henry Hamil in 1824 is likely our Henry's father or uncle. The record proves: (1) The Hamill family had presence in Donaghmoyne going back to at least 1824, (2) The Edengilrew location matches the general area of later Hamill residences, (3) Generational continuity in the area (father/uncle generation documented 1824, our Henry's generation documented 1841-1850). This earlier generation documentation helps establish the depth of Hamill family roots in County Monaghan. The surname spelling "Hamil" (vs. "Hamill" or "Hamall") demonstrates typical Irish surname variation in English records.

What This Proves:

CRITICAL DNA VALIDATION: CR matches the researcher at 19 cM, consistent with a 4th cousin relationship. CR descends from Mary Ann Hamill Byron (Owen's sister) through: Mary Ann → Mary C. Byron Barnes → subsequent generations → CR. This DNA match corroborates that: (1) Owen and Mary Ann Hamill Byron shared the same parents (Henry Hamall and Mary McMahon), (2) The documentary evidence establishing the sibling relationship is validated genetically, (3) The 19 cM amount is consistent with 4th cousins (great-great-grandchildren of siblings), (4) Common ancestors: Henry Hamall (1817-1854) & Mary McMahon (c. 1820-1874). This independent genetic evidence validates decades of documentary research and confirms the parental identification established through church records, census data, and death certificates.

What This Proves:

DK provides independent validation through a different descendant line of Mary Ann Hamill Byron. DK matches at 19 cM (identical to CR's match amount), descending through: Mary Ann Hamill Byron → Byron/Kelly family line → subsequent generations → DK. This second match proves: (1) Independent confirmation that Owen and Mary Ann were siblings, (2) The consistency of match amounts (both 19 cM) validates the 4th cousin relationship calculation, (3) Multiple descendants of Mary Ann provide corroborating genetic evidence, (4) Common ancestors: Henry Hamall & Mary McMahon. Having two independent DNA matches through the same ancestral line significantly strengthens the case beyond what a single match would provide. Both CR and DK matching at 19 cM through Mary Ann eliminates random chance and confirms biological relationships established by documentary evidence.

What This Proves:

Multiple DNA matches cluster around descendants of Gartlan families who intermarried with Hamill families in Donaghmoyne. IMPORTANT: These matches connect through the HAMILL family line in Ireland, NOT through Kate Griffith. The Gartlan cluster validates: (1) James Hamill (1827-1914) married Ann Gartlan in Dian townland, (2) James Hamill Jr. (1874-1951) married Catherine Gartlan (1883-1961)—second generation intermarriage, (3) Geographic proximity of Hamill and Gartlan families in Donaghmoyne, (4) Extended family network in County Monaghan. These matches don't prove direct relationships but validate the broader family context and intermarriage patterns documented in Irish church and land records. The cluster approach (multiple matches from same ancestral lines) demonstrates reasonably exhaustive research and corroborates documentary findings about Irish family networks.

What This Proves:

A separate DNA cluster validates Mary McMahon as Owen's mother through matches to McMahon family descendants from County Monaghan. This maternal line cluster is distinct from the paternal Hamill/Gartlan cluster. The McMahon matches prove: (1) Mary McMahon's family presence in County Monaghan, (2) Owen's maternal line connection to Irish McMahon families, (3) Integration of McMahon and Hamill families through Henry and Mary's 1841 marriage. The cluster analysis demonstrates the expected pattern—matches through both paternal (Hamill) and maternal (McMahon) lines validate Owen's documented parentage. While individual cluster matches are moderate strength (14-35 cM, 3rd-4th cousin range), the pattern of multiple matches from both parental lines significantly strengthens the overall case.